A Study to Evaluate the combined effect of cromolyn Sodium and Fenofibrate in Gentamicin induced Nephropathy

 

Aarif Wani, Jasmine Chaudhary, Akash Jain*

MM College of Pharmacy, MM (Deemed to be University), Mullana (Ambala)-133207, Haryana, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: akash2911@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Objective: To evaluate the combined effect of cromolyn sodium (mast cell stabilizer) and fenofibrate (PPAR-α agonist) in gentamicin-induced nephropathy. Method: Gentamicin (80mg/kg i.p.) was administered constantly for 8 days to induce nephrotoxicity as a result of activation of mast cell mediators, alteration of lipid profile and initiation of renal oxidative stress. Therefore, its incidence and progression was assessed by biochemical and histopathological examination along with lipid profile and renal oxidative stress. Treatment with cromolyn sodium, Fenofibrate as well as their combination was continued for 10 days in nephrotoxic rats and the parameters were assessed in normal as well as gentamicin-induced rats with or without treatment. Result: The histopathological and biochemical results revealed that treatment with cromolyn sodium (50 mg/kg p.o) prevents the noxious effect of gentamicin by inhibiting mast cell activation and decreasing release of different pro-inflammatory cytokines. A low dose of fenofibrate (32 mg/kg p.o) regulates the distorted lipid profile in gentamicin-induced rats. The combination dose of cromolyn sodium and fenofibrate was more capable in satisfying the gentamicin-induced nephropathy and renal oxidative stress when compared with either standard drug lisinopril (1 mg/kg p.o.) or drug alone. Conclusion: Combination of cromolyn sodium with fenofibrate can be used as an effective nephroprotective approach to treat the gentamicin induced nephropathy.

 

KEYWORDS: Nephropathy, Oxidative stress, Cromolyn sodium, Lisinopril, Fenofibrate

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Nephropathy is considered as thickening of mesangial expansion and basement membranes with the development of glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy1 and is related to constant elevated arterial blood pressure, albuminuria, fluid retention and declined glomerular filtration rate (GFR)2. The gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity occurs by selective accumulation of the drug in renal proximal convoluted tubules resulting loss of its brush border reliability3, renal free radical generation, glomerular congestion, and acute tubular necrosis, leading to reduction of glomerular filtration rate and thus producing renal dysfunction4.

 

Upreggulation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) leading to extracellular matrix expansion, overproduction of extracellular matrix molecules and renal hypertrophy5,6, elevation of endothelin-1 leading to increased macrophage/ monocytes infiltration in renal cortex and medulla, induction of oxidative stress7, genetic vulnerability8 and necrosis9,10 are some of the pathological mechanisms involved in gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. However, the choice of treatment for administration of gentamicin nephrotoxicity is inadequate due to partial understanding of the chief pathogenesis of nephropathy.

 

Cromolyn sodium, a mast cell stabilizer, inhibits the mast cell activation by confining transition of calcium over mast cell membrane, avoiding degranulation and arrival of vasoactive substances and thus are used to prevent eye inflammation and asthma11. A marked role of mast cell stabilizers in streptozotacin [STZ] induced nephropathy12 and cisplatin-induced kidney injury13 has also been reported but their role in combination with fenofibrate has not been studied so far in gentamicin-induced nephropathy. Hence, the current study has been proposed to observe the role of mast cell stabilizer (cromolyn sodium) and PPAR-α agonist (fenofibrate) in preventing the gentamicin-induced nephropathy in rats.

 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, plays an important role in the regulation of lipid metabolism14. Treatment with fenofibrate, a PPAR-α agonist, provide renoprotection by reducing albuminuria, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine and preventing glomerular lesions in nephrotoxicity15. Therefore, concurrent activation of mast cell stabilizers and PPAR-α administered together, could be a possible therapeutic choice to regulate the release of mast cell mediators and hyperlipidemia in gentamicin-induced nephropathy in rats.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Experimental design:

The experimental protocol was approved from CPCSEA certified Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (Protocol No.–MMCP-IAEC-26) for the purpose of control and supervision of experiments on animals. Healthy albino rats weighing about 170-200g of either sex were used for the study and were kept under standard laboratory conditions (22±3°C) in hygienic dry polycarbonate cages and fed with standard chow and water ad libitum during the experimental period. Serum isolated from collected blood samples was stored at 2-8°C temperature for biochemical parameters estimation. The kidneys of rats were excised for histopathological studies.

 

Experimental protocol:

Six groups of albino rats (each consisting of 6 rats) of either gender were used in the current study. Treatment with cromolyn sodium and fenofibrate was continued for 10 days in nephrotoxic rats (induced by injecting gentamicin constantly for 8 days). The parameters were assessed at 0th, 9th and end of the 14th day in normal as well as gentamicin-induced rats with or without treatment. The rats were grouped as

·       Group I [Normal Control]: This group was maintained on food and water.

·       Group II [Gentamicin control]: Rats were administered gentamicin (80mg/kg i.p constantly for 8 days).

·       Group III [Cromolyn Sodium treated Group]: The rats after 8 days of gentamicin administered were treated with cromolyn sodium (50mg/kg p.o) for 14 days.

·       Group IV [Fenofibrate treated Group]: The gentamicin administered rats after 8 days were treated with fenofibrate (32mg/kg p.o) for 14 days.

·       Group V [Lisinopril treated Group]: The gentamicin administered rats after 8 days were treated with lisinopril (1mg/kg p.o.) for 14 days.

·       Group VI [Cromolyn sodium and Fenofibrate treated Group]: The rats after 8 days of gentamicin administration were treated with cromolyn sodium (80mg/kg p.o) and fenofibrate (32mg/kg p.o) combination for 14 days.

 

Assessment of Nephropathy:

Nephropathy was assessed by estimating serum creatinine using alkaline picrate method16, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) using berthelot method17, urine protein using pyragallol red method18 with commercially accessible kit (ERBA Diagnostics Mannheim GmbH, Transasia Bio-medicals Ltd., Baddi, India). The concentration of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen was observed to be markedly increased in gentamicin-induced rats after 8 days as compared to normal rats (Table 1). Treatment with fenofibrate and cromolyn significantly prevented increase in serum creatinine (Fig. 1a), protein urea (Fig. 1b) and blood urea nitrogen (Fig. 1c) in gentamicin-induced rats. However, treatment with Feno-cromolyn sodium combination was found more effective in reducing serum creatinine, proteinurea and blood urea nitrogen level than individual drug-treated groups (Table 2).


 

 

Table 1: Effect of Cromolyn sodium, Fenofibrate, Lisinopril and Feno-cromolyn Combination on Creatinine, Proteinuria and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) at 15th day in gentamicin-induced nephropathy in rats.

 

Groups

Parameters

Serum creatinine (mg/dl)

BUN (mg/dl)

Protein urea (g/dl)

Normal Control

1.71±0.035***

8.69±1.97***

5.60±0.378***

Gentamicin Control (80mg/kg )

2.46±0.073

18.97±1.164

9.42±0.321

Lisinopril Treated Group (1mg/kg)

1.85±0.122***

14.81±1.701***

8.68±0.337***

Cromolyn sodium Treated Group(50mg/kg)

1.96±0.052***

16.38±1.113*

10.37±0.100**

Fenofibrate Treated Group (32mg/kg)

1.94±0.058**

16.01±0.693**

8.52±0.170

Cromo+ Feno (50+32mg/kg)

1.74±0.092***

10.21±0.511***

7.28±0.090***

All values are represented as mean ± S.D.*=p<0.05 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control; **=p<0.01 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control; ***=p<0.001 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control

 

Fig. 1: Effect of cromolyn sodium, Fenofibrate, Lisinopril and Feno-cromolyn Combination on serum creatinine (a), proteinurea (b) and blood urea nitrogen (c) at 15th day in gentamicin induced nephropathy.

 


Assessments of Lipid Profile:

Cholesterol peroxidase method (CHOD-PAP)19, Glycerol phosphate oxidase (GPO-PAP) method20 and Polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation method21 using commercially available kit (ERBA Diagnostics Mannheim GmbH, Transasia Bio-medicals Ltd., Baddi, India) was used for the estimation of serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) respectively. The increase in serum concentration of cholesterol, LDL and triglyceride and a decrease in HDL level was observed in gentamicin-induced rats as compared to normal rats (Table 2). Treatment with Feno-cromolyn sodium combination significantly prevented increase in cholesterol (Fig. 2a), LDL (Fig. 2b) and triglyceride levels (Fig. 2c) and decrease in HDL level (Fig. 2d) in gentamicin-induced rats.


 

Table 2: Effect of Cromolyn sodium, Fenofibrate, Lisinopril and Feno-cromolyn combination on Triglyceride, Cholesterol, HDL- Cholesterol and LDL-Cholesterol at 15th day in gentamicin-induced nephropathy.

 

Groups

Parameters

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

Cholesterol (mg/dl)

HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dl)

LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dl)

Normal Control

136.12±3.980***

135.33±3.777***

41.51±2.250**

93.82±4.75***

Gentamicin Control (80mg/kg )

148.61±2.690

179.67±2.805

37.06±2.337

142.60±2.97

Lisinopril Treated Group (1mg/kg)

142.34±2.013**

154.80±4.856***

38.68±2.092

116.12±2.97***

Cromolyn sodium Treated Group (50mg/kg)

145.26±1.915

168.92±5.730**

40.38±1.617

128.54±5.94**

Fenofibrate Treated Group (32mg/kg)

146.17±1.483

171.13±2.626***

39.77±2.002

116.40±3.20

Cromo+ Feno (50+32mg/kg)

139.73±1.914***

141.50±3.274***

40.95±1.394*

94.25±3.17***

All values are represented as mean ± S.D. *=p<0.05 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control; **=p<0.01 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control; ***=p<0.001 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control

 

Fig. 2: Effect of Cromolyn sodium, Fenofibrate, Lisinopril and Feno-cromolyn combination on cholesterol (a), LDL (b) and triglyceride levels (c) and HDL level (d) at 15th day in gentamicin induced nephropathy

 


Histopathological study:

The changes in glomeruli were measured histologically as per method reported by Crowell et al., 200422. The kidney was instantly engaged in 10% formalin and then dehydrated in ranked concentrations of alcohol, wrapped up in xylene and then fixed in paraffin. Kidney sections (5μm in the thickness) were made and marked with hematoxylin and eosin to measure pathological modifications occurs in glomeruli using light microscopy (400x). The kidney of the gentamicin-induced rats increases pathological alterations in the glomeruli such as extracellular mesangial expansion and glomerular capillary size reduction in contrast to kidney of the normal rat. The combined administration of cromolyn sodium and fenofibrate clearly reduced these pathological alterations in glomeruli in contrast to treatment with either drug alone (Fig. 3).

 

Fig. 3: Effect of cromolyn sodium and fenofibrate on pathological modifications in glomeruli.

 

Assessment of renal oxidative stress:

Estimation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) using method reported by Ohkawa et al., 197923 and reduced glutathione (GSH) using method reported by Davies et al., 198424 was used for the assessment of renal oxidative stress. The TBARS and GSH was calculated using formula

 

TBARS= Optical density of organic layer/Extinction coefficient × Protein conc. × Incubation time × Volume of sample

Extinction coefficient of chromophore =

1.56 x 105 M-1cm-1

 

GSH= Optical Density/ Extinction coefficient × Protein conc. × Volume of sample

Extinction coefficient of chromophore = 13600 M-1cm-1

 

A marked increase in tissue TBARS and decrease in reduced glutathione (GSH) was observed in kidney of gentamicin-induced rats as compared to normal rats (Table 3). Treatment with fenofibrate, cromolyn sodium and Feno-cromolyn sodium combination significantly prevented gentamicin-induced increase in TBARS level (Fig. 4a) and decrease in GSH level (Fig. 4b). In addition, fenofibrate and cromolyn sodium also prevented an increase in TBARS and decrease in GSH levels (Table 3).

 

Table 3: Effect of Fenofibrate, Cromolyn sodium, Lisinopril and Feno-Cromolyn Combination on reduced Glutathione (GSH) and Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) at 15th day in gentamicin-induced nephropathy in rats.

 

Groups

Parameters

TBARS (nmol/ml)

GSH (μM/ml)

Normal Control

1.167±0.225***

6.981±0.091***

Gentamicin Control (80mg/kg )

5.056±0.495

2.539±0.356

Lisinopril Treated Group (1mg/kg)

2.123±0.225***

5.504±0.403**

Cromolyn sodium Treated Group (50mg/kg)

3.653±1.307**

4.960±0.442**

Fenofibrate Treated Group (32mg/kg)

4.036±0.045

3.719±0.943***

Cromo+ Feno (50+32mg/kg)

1.581±0.180***

6.724±0.628***

All values are represented as mean ± S.D. *=p<0.05 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control; **=p<0.01 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control; ***=p<0.001 vs gentamicin induced nephrotoxic control

 

Fig. 4: Effect of Cromolyn sodium, Fenofibrate, Lisinopril and Feno-cromolyn combination on TBARS (4a) and GSH (4b) at 15th day in gentamicin induced nephropathy.

Statistical analysis:

All values were expressed as Mean± S.D. The data obtained from various groups were statistically analyzed using one way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant and were of two tailed.

 

DISCUSSION:

The current study investigated the potential role of cromolyn sodium, a mast cell stabilizer and fenofibrate, a PPAR-α agonist halting the nephrotoxicity in gentamicin induced rats. Elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine and proteinurea have been recognized as an indicator of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity24. The administration of gentamicin shows a significant (P<0.05) increase in the level of all these parameters which points towards kidney dysfunction. Also, the reduced concentration of glutathione and increase in lipid peroxidation are considered to be an index of development of oxidative stress25 which has been evaluated by measuring TBARS which has been enhanced significantly (P<0.05), along with subsequent decrease in GSH.

 

Mast cells are the principal source of chymase (liberated through mast cell degranulation) along with powerful chemical mediators, such as cytokines, macrophage, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), histamine, heparin, leukotrienes26,27, which plays an important role in inflammatory tissues through its proteolytic activities to cause tissue remodelling, and is responsible for formation of Angiotensin II, alteration in lipid metabolism and activation of TGF leading to tubulointerstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis28,29 which signifies that mast cells are linked with the progression of kidney fibrosis28. In addition, it has been reported that release of histamine appreciably enhance intracellular accumulation of gentamicin30, the main cause of nephropathy. Gentamicin in lower dose (4mg/kg) for 7-14 days and at high dose (100mg/kg/day) decreased secretion of glomerular renin and ACE from kidney respectively. The increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity results inactivation of antioxidant enzymes such as GSH and SOD31 and worsen the function and structure of kidney. Therefore, mast cell stabilization may reduce the renal oxidative stress in gentamicin induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Cromolyn sodium decrease the quantity of residential mast cells which further inhibits the release of newly synthesized and pre-formed chemical mediators from mast cells involved in inflammatory and allergic responses32,33. In the current study, histopathological examination revealed intracellular oedema, degeneration, necrosis and glomerulus narrowing in epithelial cells of the proximal tubules approving that kidney is extremely susceptible to gentamicin toxicity and treatment with cromolyn sodium reduced the gentamicin-induced enhance in mast cell degranulation, renal oxidative stress and prevented histopathological changes, thus halting the progression of gentamicin induced nephrotoxicity.

 

Hyperlipidemia has also been reported to be an autonomous risk factor for introduction and development of nephropathy34. The receptors present on mesangial cells occupies oxidized LDL, resulting in generation of prostaglandin E2 and cytotoxic agents, such as TNF, numerous cytokines viz. platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), IL-6 and TGFβ which promotes an injury to glomerular endothelial and epithelial cells, causes sclerosis35,36. Thus, the drug-induced, increase in circulating lipids takes part in the progression and generation of nephropathy. In the current study an increase in triglycerides and serum cholesterol and subsequent decrease in serum HDL and increase in serum LDL levels has been observed in gentamicin induced rats with nephropathy. Treatment with fenofibrate (PPAR-α agonist) prevented the development of gentamicin induced nephropathy through its anti-apoptosis effect in renal tubular cells37. It improves lipotoxicity via activation of AMPK-PGC-1α-ERR-1α-FoxO3a signalling, showing its potential as a therapeutic modality for nephropathy38. Reducing the circulating lipids in renal patients may provide a new therapeutic option in managing nephropathy14. Fenofibrate also provides renoprotection by reducing COX-2 expression along with nitrosative and oxidative stress39. Stimulation of PPAR-α using fenofibrate has been accounted to generate renoprotective outcome by down regulating the kidney expression of TGF-β40. Renoprotective effect of lisinopril as an ACE inhibitor has been well accounted in various studies41 due to which it has been used as a standard drug. The renoprotective effect of combination of cromolyn sodium and fenofibrate observed in the current study was better to the result produced by Lisinopril in gentamicin-induced nephropathy.

 

CONCLUSION:

Thus it can be concluded that the combined dose of cromolyn sodium and fenofibrate may have halted the development of gentamicin-induced nephropathy by declining the renal oxidative stress (ROS), preventing the degranulation of resident kidney mast cells and reducing the altered lipid profile.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are highly grateful to the management of Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana for providing the necessary facilities.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Matsumura N, Shiiki H, Nishino T, Dohi K. Unusual Case of Membranous Nephropathy Exhibiting Type III Collagen Microfibrils. Nephron 1998; 80(1): 104-105.

2.      Arora MK, Reddy K, Balakumar P. The low dose combination of fenofibrate and rosiglitazone halts the progression of diabetes-induced experimental nephropathy. Eur J Pharmacol 2010; 636(1-3): 137-144.

3.      Pazhayattil GS, Shirali AC. Drug-induced impairment of renal function. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2014; 7: 457-468.

4.      Hendriks JG, vanHorn JR, van der Mei, H.C., Busscher, H.J., 2004. Backgrounds of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and prosthesis-related infection. Biomaterials 2014; 25(3): 545-556.

5.      Chen S, Hong S, Iglesias-de la Cruz MC, Isono M, Casaretto A, Ziyadeh F. The key role of the transforming growth factor-β system in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Ren Fail 2001; 23(3-4): 471-481.

6.      Stangou M, Bhangal G, Lai PC, Smith J, Keith JC Jr, Boyle JJ, et al. Effect of IL-11 on glomerular expression of TGF-beta and extracellular matrix in nephrotoxic nephritis in Wistar Kyoto rats. J Nephrol 2011; 24(1): 106-111.

7.      Ling XC, Kuo KL. Oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. Ren Replace Ther 2018; 4: 53.

8.      Prabhakar SS. Pathogenic role of nitric oxide alterations in diabetic nephropathy. Curr Diab Rep 2005; 5(6): 449-454.

9.      Geleilete TJ, Melo GC, Costa RS, Volpini RA, Soares TJ, Coimbra TM. Role of myofibroblasts, macrophages, transforming growth factor-beta endothelin, angiotensin-II, and fibronectin in the progression of tubulointerstitial nephritis induced by gentamicin. J Nephrol 2002; 15(6): 633-642.

10.   Hur E, Garip A, Camyar A, Ilgun S, Ozisik M, Tuna S, et al. The effects of vitamin D on gentamicin-induced acute kidney injury in experimental rat model. Int J Endocrinol 2013: 1-7.

11.   Carr W, Schaeffer J, Donnenfeld E. Treating allergic conjunctivitis: A once-daily medication that provides 24-hour symptom relief. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) 2016; 7(2): 107-114.

12.   Reddy JM, Reddy VMP, Dass RBR. The novel role of mast cell stabilizer in halting the development of nephropathy in diabetic rats: Implication of resident renal mast cells. ICMBPS 2012: 84-89.

13.   Perse M., Veceric-Haler Z. Cisplatin-induced rodent model of kidney injury: Characteristics and challenges. Biomed Res Int 2018: 1462802.

14.   Cheng CF, Chen HH, Lin H. Role of PPARα and its agonist in renal diseases. PPAR Res 2010: 345098-345098.

15.   Finco DR, Duncan JR. Evaluation of blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine concentrations as indicators of renal dysfunction: A study of 111 cases and a review of related literature. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1976; 168(7): 593-601.

16.   Taussky HH, Bonsnes RW. On the colorimetric determination of creatinine by the jaffe reaction. J Biol Chem 1945; 158: 581.

17.   Fawcett JK, Scott JE. A rapid and precise method for the determination of urea. J Clin Path 1960; 13: 156-159.

18.   Watanabe N, Kamei S, Ohkubo A, Yamanaka M, Ohsawa S, Makino K, et al. Urinary protein as measured with a pyrogallol red-molybdate complex, manually and in a Hitachi 726 automated analyzer. Clin Chem 1986; 32(8): 1551-4.

19.   Penumarthy S, Penmetsa GS, Mannem S. Assessment of serum levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in periodontitis patients. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013; 17(1): 30-35.

20.   Fossati P, Prencipe L. Serum triglycerides determined colorimetrically with an enzyme that produces hydrogen peroxide. Clin Chem 1982; 28(10): 2077-2080.

21.   Allain C, Poon LS, Chan CSG, Wy R, Fu PC. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem 1974; 20(4): 470-5.

22.   Crowell JA, Korytko PJ, Morrissey RL, Booth TD, Levine BS. Resveratrol-associated renal toxicity. Toxicol Sci 2004; 82(2): 614-619.

23.   Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 1979; 95(2): 351-358.

24.   Udupa V, Prakash V. Gentamicin induced acute renal damage and its evaluation using urinary biomarkers in rats. Toxicol Rep 2018; 6: 91-99.

25.   Ratliff BB, Abdulmahdi W, Pawar R, Wolin MS. Oxidant mechanisms in renal injury and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 2016; 25(3): 119-146.

26.   Amin K. The role of mast cells in allergic inflammation. Respir Med 2012; 106(1): 9-14.

27.   Naclerio R. Clinical manifestations of the release of histamine and other inflammatory mediators. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103(3): S382–S385.

28.   Holdsworth SR, Summers SA. Role of mast cells in progressive renal diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 19(12): 2254-2261.

29.   He A. Shi GP. Mast cell chymase and tryptase as targets for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Curr Pharm Des 2013; 19(6): 1114-1125.

30.   Ward DT, McLarnon SJ, Riccardi D. Aminoglycosides increase intracellular calcium levels and ERK activity in proximal tubular OK cells expressing the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13(6): 1481-89.

31.   Ghaznavi H, Mehrzadi S, Dormanesh B, Tabatabaei SMTH, Vahedi H, Hosseinzadeh A, et al. Comparison of the protective effects of melatonin and silymarin against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2016; 21(4): NP49-NP55.

32.   Sinniah A, Yazid S, Flower RJ. The anti-allergic cromones: Past, present, and future. Front Pharmacol 2017; 8: 827.

33.   Kennedy LL, Hargrove LA, Graf AB, Francis TC, Hodges KM, Nguyen QP, et al. Inhibition of mast cell-derived histamine secretion by cromolyn sodium treatment decreases biliary hyperplasia in cholestatic rodents. Lab Invest 2014; 94(12): 1406-1418.

34.   Gyebi L, Soltani Z, Reisin E. Lipid nephrotoxicity: new concept for an old disease. Curr Hypertens Rep 2012; 14(2): 177-181.

35.   Agrawal S, Zaritsky JJ, Fornoni A, Smoyer WE. Dyslipidaemia in nephrotic syndrome: mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol 2018; 14(1): 57-70.

36.   Ortega-Velazquez R, Gonzalez-Rubio M, Ruiz-Torres MP, Diez-Marques ML, Iglesias MC, Rodriguez-Puyol M, et al. Collagen I upregulates extracellular matrix gene expression and secretion of TGF-beta 1 by cultured human mesangial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2004; 286(6): C1335-1343.

37.   Chen HH, Sue YM, Chen CH, Hsu YH, Hou CC, Cheng CY, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha plays a crucial role in L-carnitine anti-apoptosis effect in renal tubular cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24(10): 3042-3049.

38.   Hong YA, Lim JH, Kim MY, Kim TW, Kim Y, Yang KS, et al. Fenofibrate improves renal lipotoxicity through activation of AMPK-PGC-1alpha in db/db mice. PLoS One 2014; 9(5): e96147.

39.   Ibrahim MA, El-Sheikh AA, Khalaf HM, Abdelrahman AM. Protective effect of peroxisome proliferator activator receptor (PPAR)-α and -γ ligands against methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2014; 36(2): 130-137.

40.   Matsushita Y, Ogawa D, Wada J, Yamamoto N, Shikata K, Sato C, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta inhibits streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy through anti-inflammatory mechanisms in mice. Diabetes 2011; 60(3): 960-968.

41.   Protasov K, Fedorishina O, Dzizinsky A, Antonenko N. Renoprotective effect of the lisinopril and amlodipine fixed combination in patients with arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus. J Hypertens 2011; 29: e405.

 

 

 

Received on 09.09.2019           Modified on 16.11.2019

Accepted on 18.12.2019         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(7): 3215-3220.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00569.7